<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Inquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress</link>
	<description>Omphaloskepsis &#62; navel-gazing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Kids&#8217; Freedom Part 2</title>
		<link>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2012/short-post/kids-freedom-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2012/short-post/kids-freedom-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronan McDonnell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Short Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resticting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/?p=1659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Kids' freedom is a necessary part of learning, spreading their wings. Why are we restricting it?</p><p>Original content created by: <a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress">The Inquisition</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most enduringly popular articles on the Inquisition is an <a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2010/history/kids-freedom/" title="Kids Freedom">examination of the ever tighter curtailing of the freedoms afforded to modern children</a>. As time passes, our children&#8217;s ability to explore, learn and grow is being impeded. Protective wrapping is smothering entire worlds, inhibiting development.</p>
<p>This, to be fair, is being done mostly by well-intentioned and over worried parents. But this is coming at a cost to their children. Parents are listening to, and reacting against media scaremongering, fearing dangers lurking everywhere.Kids&#8217; freedom is being restricted.</p>
<p>But this <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/new-playgrounds-are-safe-and-thats-why-nobody-uses-them/252108/">over-protective stance which is harming children is being adopted by authorities in charge of schools, parks and other amenities available to children</a>. These are not so well intentioned, being more likely to be inspired by fear, personal fear. They fear lawsuits and other repercussions. They fear angry parents. They fear children learning by their own, sometimes painful, mistakes.</p>
<p class="footnotes"><strong>Bibliography</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/new-playgrounds-are-safe-and-thats-why-nobody-uses-them/252108/">The Atlantic &#8211; playgrounds are no fun</a><br />
<a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2010/history/kids-freedom/" title="Kids Freedom">Children&#8217;s worlds are shrinking</a></p>
<p>Original content created by: <a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress">The Inquisition</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2012/short-post/kids-freedom-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radioactive Cosmetics</title>
		<link>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2012/history/radioactive-cosmetics/</link>
		<comments>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2012/history/radioactive-cosmetics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ronan McDonnell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wild Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/?p=1646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Radioactove materials have been used to fortify cosmetics as a restorative</p><p>Original content created by: <a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress">The Inquisition</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Radiating Beauty</h3>
<p>Progress is a fact in every human endeavour. Cars are getting faster, or at least more efficient. Bicycle manufacturers are making them ever lighter. Records have ever greater sound depths and fidelity. Make-up is making us ever more beautiful. Well, in a way&#8230;</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1654" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 730px"><a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Tho-Radia-tin.jpg"><img src="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Tho-Radia-tin.jpg" alt="Tho-Radia tin, prominently displaying the quasi medical name, Dr Alfred Curie" title="Tho-Radia-tin" width="720" height="454" class="size-full wp-image-1654" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tho-Radia tin, prominently displaying the quasi medical name, Dr Alfred Curie</p></div><br />
<q>Equally pleasant to any of the women&#8217;s products was The Scrotal Radiendocrinator. Any man looking to restore reproductive function could employ this irradiated scrotum soak.</q></p>
<p>Recently there have been several scares in the <a href="http://editorsblog.gponline.com/2008/11/06/pseudoscience-and-the-cosmetic-industry/">predominantly pseudo-scientific beauty industry</a> &#8211; <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2092044/Jean-Claude-Mas-arrested-dawn-raid-PIP-breast-implant-silicone-scandal.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">poisoned breasts</a>, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7706818.stm">faces contaminated with nano-particles</a> and <a href="http://www.livestrong.com/article/143136-chemical-peel-dangers/">infected, burnt-off faces</a>. <a href="http://chemistscorner.com/pseudo-science-based-beauty/">Scientists are crying out to help</a>.</p>
<h3>But how about harnessing the vivacious power of radiation?</h3>
<p>Sounds enticing doesn&#8217;t it? Imagine immersing your entire being in an invisible radioactive haze. You could peel off untold layers of skin, to reveal the beautiful, young skin underneath. You could invigorate yourself from the inside out. Radioactive substances were used for all manner of consumer goods, as shown in <a href="http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/10-radioactive-products-that-people-actually-used/1388?image=1">this slideshow from Environmental Graffiti</a>, but beauty products, topically applied, must be among the most concerning.</p>
<p>Until the 1930s, Tho-Radia was a french face cream fortified with both thorium and radium. Much like Clarins&#8217; <a href="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/03/beauty-and-quack_20.html">Rashid Enamany</a>, Tho-Radia had its own fictional boffin; Dr Alfred Curie had no links to the discoverers of radiation.</p>
<p>Similar creams were marketed to women from a very early point in the last century. This was the beginning of the scientification (The Inquisition&#8217;s word) of the beauty industry. Claims went from simple beautification to the safe removal of birthmarks!</p>
<h3>Why stop at creams?</h3>
<p>Women could buy, at inflated costs, lipsticks, soaps, lotions, foods and more. Men were also looked after in this brave new world.</p>
<p>Equally pleasant to any of the women&#8217;s products was The Scrotal Radiendocrinator. Any man looking to restore reproductive function could employ this irradiated scrotum soak. Anyone stupid enough to do so should have applied it to their head instead.</p>
<p>Alternatively, they may also have been interested in Vita Radium Suppositories. After a 15 day course the men of Colorado, where it was produced, would have noticed remarkable changes.</p>
<p>All manner of ingestions were possible to receive the benefits of radiation. Radithor was a concentrated radium tonic. Eben Byers was a well known playboy and an amateur golf champion. He consumed 4 fluid ounces (approx 100ml) of it every day. He died in 1932 racked with anemia, a brain abscess and with a putrid, decaying jaw. Lovely.</p>
<p>Anyone looking to irradiate themselves ought to seek protection – especially for repeated exposure. Unfortunately, even mild doses of radiation are way beyond the frankly wild protective remit of <a hre="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/03/beauty-and-quack_20.html">Clarins Expertise 3p</a>.</p>
<p>All of this questions how people still fall for the claims made by the cosmetics industry. <a href="http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/beauty/news-features/TMG7628601/The-science-that-stops-us-looking-older.html">Scientists have always brought on board to reinforce these claims</a>, but do those creams really make you look ten years younger? Really? And do the scientists accept the limits of their knowledge &#8211; are these products not just effective but safe?</p>
<p>Consumers are easily swayed in a society which places the highest emphasis on physical beauty. After all, that little pot of cream might just work&#8230;</p>
<p><iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Wwb5UeWmSd0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p class="footnotes"><strong>Bibliography</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/offbeat-news/10-radioactive-products-that-people-actually-used/1388">Environmental Graffiti Slideshow</a><br />
<a href="http://www.mediastorehouse.com/pictures_1115464/advertisement-for-a-radium-based-facial-cream.html">Radium cream advertising</a><br />
<a href="http://home.gwi.net/~dnb/gallery/radior/radior.htm">Radior Product Shot</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/16/books/you-could-buy-radium-in-the-drugstore.html?pagewanted=1">New York Times on irradiated beauty products</a><br />
<a href="http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2007/03/beauty-and-quack_20.html">Quackometer on CLarins E3P</a><br />
<a href="http://chemistscorner.com/pseudo-science-based-beauty/">A chemist questions some products&#8217; claims</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.joedrumgoole.com/2006/01/26/bollocks-ingredients-in-female-beauty-products/">Invented chemical ingredients</a><br />
<a href="http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/pseudo_science_can_t_cover_up_the_ugly_truth_1_704607">The Scotsman</a><br />
<a href="http://editorsblog.gponline.com/2008/11/06/pseudoscience-and-the-cosmetic-industry/">Pseudoscience</a><br />
<a href="http://fashion.telegraph.co.uk/beauty/news-features/TMG7628601/The-science-that-stops-us-looking-older.html">Nano-particles described in the Telegraph</a><br />
Multiple Exposures &#8211; Chronicles of the Radiation Age, Catherine Caulfield, Harper &#038; Row, 1989<br />
Trafficking Materials and Gendered Experimental Practices: Radium Research in Early 20th Century Vienna, Maria Rentetzi, Columbia University Press, 2007 (http://www.gutenberg-e.org/rentetzi/chapter01.html)</p>
<p>Original content created by: <a href="http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress">The Inquisition</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theinquisition.eu/wordpress/2012/history/radioactive-cosmetics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.046 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.theinquisition.eu @ 2012-02-05 14:30:18 -->
